A generative framework for creative learning: A tool for planning creative-collaborative tasks in the classroom
AbstractIn this paper a generative framework for creativity is presented which extends upon Wallas’s model of creativity (1926), social learning theories and creativity theories. The framework offered here presents a distillation of learning and crea-tivity theory drawing upon salient roots of both creativity and learning theories in the 21st century. The generative framework can be instantiated for use as a learning support tool to assist with the design of classroom and / or other crea-tive learning experiences. Creativity theories are discussed in relation to their appropriateness of the framework. An explanation of the framework is present-ed and an example instantiation provided. The development of the generative framework has been influenced by psychological accounts of creativity and socio-constructivist accounts of learning. The framework presented here has a number of implications for creativity theory as well as teaching and learning practice.
Amabile, T.M (1983). The psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualiza-tion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45. pp. 357-376
Bandura, A (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs; NJ Prentice Hall.
Boden, M (1992) Creativity. Journal of Creativity Behaviour. 26(3). pp. 213-217.
Briskman, L (1980). Creative product and creative process in science and art. Inquiry. 23. pp. 83 – 106.
Candy, L & Edmonds, E.A (1999). Introducing creativity to Cognition. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Creativity and Cognition. Loughborough, UK. pp. 3-6.
Claxton (1998). Hare Brain Tortoise Mind: Why Intelligence Increases When you Think Less. London. Fourth Estate Limited.
Csikszentmihalyi, M & Sawer, K (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary movement. Sternberg, R.J & Davidson, J.E (Eds.) The Nature of In-sight. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
Csikszentmihalyi, M (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R.J (Ed) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge; Cam-bridge University Press. pp. 313-335.
Csikszentmihalyi, M (1988). Society, culture and person: a systems view of creativi-ty. In Sternberg, R.J (Ed), The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. pp. 325-339.
Derry, S.J (1999). A fish called peer learning: searching for common themes. In A. M O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.) Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning. Mahwah; NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dewey, J. (1989). Freedom and Culture. Buffalo; NY. Prometheus. (Original work published 1939).
Driscoll, M. P (1994). Psychology for Learning Instruction. Needham; MA. Allyn & Ba-con.
Ertmer, P.A & Newby, T.J (1993). Behaviourism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perfor-mance Improvement Quarterly. 6, 4. pp. 50-72.
Fasko (2001). Education and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. Vol 13. Nos. 3 & 4. pp. 317-327
Fischer, G (1991). Supporting learning on demand with design environments. In Birnbaum, L (Ed), International Conference on the Learning Science. Evanston;IL. pp. 165-175.
Forrester, D & Jantzie, N (2001). Learning Theories. [online]. Available from: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~gnjantzi/learning_theories.htm
Frank, C (2005). Teaching and learning theory: who needs it? College Quarterly. No. 2, Vol 8.#
Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Gero, J & Maher, M (1993) Creativity and Knowledge Based Creative Design. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ.
Getzels, J.W (1964). Creative Thinking, Problem-Solving, and Instruction. In E.R. Hilgard (Ed), Theories of Learning and Instruction. Chicago; University of Chica-go Press.
Guilford, J. P (1967). Creativity: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Creative Behaviour. 1. pp. 3-14.
Guilford, J. P (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist. 5. pp. 444-454
Hadamard, J (1945). An Essay of Invention in the Mathematics Field. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press.
Harel, I (1991) Children Designer’s: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing mathematics in a Computer Rich School. Norwood; NJ. Ablex Publishing.
Hennessey, B.A. (2004). Creativity, classrooms, culture, and communication. Re-view of The Educational Psychology of Creativity by John Houtz (Ed.). Contempo-rary Psychology: APA Review of Books. 49. pp. 761-763.
Honebein, P.C, Duffy, T. M & Fishman, B. J (1996). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In Duffy, T. M, Lowyck, J & Jonassen, D.H (Eds.) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Springer-Verlag. Berlin
Houtz, J. C & Krug, D (1995). Assessment of creativity: resolving a mid-life crisis. Educational Psychology Review. 7. pp. 269-300.
Kaha, N (1983). The creative mind: form and process. Journal of Creative Behaviour. 17. pp. 84-94
Karnes, M. B, McCoy, G.F, Zehrbach, R.R, Wollersheim, J.P, Clarizio, H.F, Costin, L & Stanley, L.S (1961). Factors Associated with Overachievement of Intellectually Gifted Children. Champaign, IL.
Laurillard, D (1995). Multimedia and the changing experience of the learner. British Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 179-189
Leytham, G (1990). Managing Creativity. Norfolk; Peter Francis Publishers.
Martindale, C (1990). The Clockwork Muse. Basic Books; New York.
McMahon, M (1997). Social constructivism and the world wide web: A paradigm for learning. Proceedings of the ASCILITE Conference. Perth, Australia. Decem-ber.
Mumford, M.D & Gustafson, S.B (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration, applica-tion and innovation. Psychological Bulletin. 103, 1. pp. 27-43.
Papert, S (1993). The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York; Basic Books.
Patrick, C (1938). Scientific Thought. Journal of Psychology. 5. pp. 55-83.
Patrick, C (1937). Creative Thought in Artists. Journal of Psychology. 4. pp. 35-73.
Poincare (1913). in Leytham, G (1990) Managing Creativity. Norfolk. Peter Francis Publishers.
Rogers, C. R (1969). Freedom to Learn. Ohio, U.S .Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Rossman, J (1931). The Psychology of the Inventor. Washington DC; Inventors Publish-ing.
Runco (1996). Creativity from Childhood through Adulthood. New Directions for Child Devel-opment no. 72. Summer 1996.
Runco, M.A & Bahleda, M.D (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific and eve-ryday creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour. 20. pp. 93-98.
Sanders, E.B (2001). Collective creativity. LOOP: AIGA Journal of Interaction Design Education. No 4.
Sapp, D.D (1992). The point of creative frustration and the creative process. A new look at an old model. Journal of Creative Behaviour. 26. pp. 21 – 28.
Sawyer, K. (2007). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books
Schank, R (1995). What we Learn when we Learn by Doing. Technical Report No. 60. Institute of Learning Sciences, Northwestern University, Illinois.
Schon, D (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Harper Collins.
Stager, G (2005). Towards a pedagogy of online constructionist learning. Proceedings of the 2005 World Conference on Computers in Education. Stellenbosch, South Af-rica.
Sternberg, Robert J. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R.J (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49. pp. 607 – 627
Sternberg, R & Lubart, T (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its devel-opment. Human Development. 34. pp. 1 – 31.
Tapscott, Don. & Williams, Anthony D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Portfolio (Penguin).
Torrance, E.P (1981). Creative teaching makes a difference. In Gowan, J.C, Khate-na, J & Torrance, E.P (Eds.) Creativity: Its Educational Implications. Dubuque, IA; Kendall/Hunt
Vosniadou, S (1996). Towards a Revised Cognitive Psychology for New Advances in Learning and Instruction. Learning and Instruction. Vol. 6. No. 2. pp. 95-109
Vygotsky, L. S (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Massachusetts. Harvard University Press.
Wallas (1926). The Art of Thought. London; Johnathan Cape [republished in 1931].
Wilson, B. G., & Myers, K. M. (2000). Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.) Theoretical foundations of learn-ing environments. Mahwah; NJ. Erlbaum. pp. 57-88.
Terms and conditions associated with Transnational Press London Journals Transfer of Copyright Agreement
Copyright to the unpublished and original article submitted by the author(s), the abstract forming part thereof, and any subsequent errata (collectively, the “Article”) is hereby transferred to the Transnational Press London (TPL) for the full term thereof throughout the world, subject to the Author Rights (as hereinafter defined) and to acceptance of the Article for publication in a journal of TPL. This transfer of copyright includes all material to be published as part of the Article (in any medium), including but not limited to tables, figures, graphs, movies, other multimedia files, and all supplemental materials. TPL shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
The author(s) shall have the following rights (the “Author Rights”):
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The nonexclusive right, after publication by TPL, to give permission to third parties to republish print versions of the Article or a translation thereof, or excerpts therefrom, without obtaining permission from TPL, provided the TPL-prepared version is not used for this purpose, the Article is not republished in another journal, and the third party does not charge a fee. If the TPL version is used, or the third party republishes in a publication or product charging a fee for use, permission from TPL must be obtained.
- The right to use all or part of the Article, including the TPL-prepared version without revision or modification, on the author(s)’ web home page or employer’s website and to make copies of all or part of the Article, including the TPL-prepared version without revision or modification, for the author(s)’ and/or the employer’s use for educational or research purposes.
- The right to post and update the Article on free-access e-print servers as long as files prepared and/or formatted by TPL or its vendors are not used for that purpose. Any such posting made or updated after acceptance of the Article for publication shall include a link to the online abstract in the TPL journal or to the entry page of the journal. If the author wishes the TPL-prepared version to be used for an online posting other than on the author(s)’ or employer’s website, TPL permission is required; if permission is granted, TPL will provide the Article as it was published in the journal, and use will be subject to TPL terms and conditions.
- The right to make, and hold copyright in, works derived from the Article, as long as all of the following conditions are met: (a) at least one author of the derived work is an author of the Article; (b) the derived work includes at least ten (10) percent of new material not covered by TPL’s copyright in the Article; and (c) the derived work includes no more than fifty (50) percent of the text (including equations) of the Article. If these conditions are met, copyright in the derived work rests with the authors of that work, and TPL (and its successors and assigns) will make no claim on that copyright. If these conditions are not met, explicit TPL permission must be obtained. Nothing in this Section shall prevent TPL (and its successors and assigns) from exercising its rights in the Article.
All copies of part or all of the Article made under any of the Author Rights shall include the appropriate bibliographic citation and notice of the TPL copyright.
By submitting a paper to the TPL journal, authors agree to this Agreement, and represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. The submitting author(s) also represent and warrant that they have the full power to enter into this Agreement and to make the grants contained herein.