Measuring academic research performance through audit at the expense of trust: Exploring the 21st Century University
AbstractBritish universities are experiencing a climate of fiscal austerity including severe budget cuts coupled with intensifying competition for markets have seen the emergence of audit culture which afflicts the public sector in general. This entails the risk to the integrity of university culture disappearing. This paper seeks to explore the interconnections between developing trends in universities which cause processes likely to undermine the objectivity and independence of research. We question that universities’ alignment with the capitalist business sector and the dominant market economy culture. Despite arguably positive aspects, there is a danger that universities may be dominated by hegemonic sectional interest rather than narratives of openness and democratically oriented critique. We also argue that audit culture embedded in reputation management, quality control and ranking hierarchies may necessarily promote deception while diminishing a collegiate culture of trust and pursuit of truth which is replaced by destructive impersonal accountability procedures. Such transitions inevitably contain insidious implications for the nature of the academy and undermine the values of academic-intellectual life.
Adler, K. H., Berry, D., Clarke, J., and 15 others (2010) Alumni’s plea: think again, Times Higher Education, No. 1, 935, 30-31.
Akhurst, J. (2005) Enhancing the employability of psychology graduates. York: Higher Education Academy Network.
Baier, A. (1986) Trust and Antitrust. Ethics 96(2): 231-260.
Barnabè, Federico and Riccaboni, Angelo (2007) “Which role for performance measurement systems in higher education? Focus on quality assurance in Italy”, Studies In Educational Evaluation, 33(3-4): 302-319.
Baty, P. (2010a) Rankings partner focuses on matters of reputation, Times Higher Education, No. 1,938.
Baty. P. (2010b) Do your job well, and you will rise, Times Higher Education, No. 1935, 5.
Bourdieu, P. (1993) The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature, Cambridge: Polity.
Brown, K. B. (2010) Rank outsider, New Statesman, 22nd March.
Cheater, A. P. (1995) Social Anthropology, London, Routledge.
Clark. A. (2010) Capitol Hill attacks ‘intimidating’ Glaxo, The Guardian, 23/2/10, p. 25.
Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University
Coleman, J.S. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Collini, S. (2006) Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corbett, A. (2010) My, how you’ve grown, Times Higher Education, No. 1,938.
Corbyn, Z. (2010a) A clear and present danger, Times Higher Education, No. 1,934, 11th February, 34-37.
Corbyn, Z. (2010b) Dark clouds threaten UK prosperity if blue-skies research not a priority, Times Higher Education, No. 1,938.
Corbyn, Z. (2010c) ‘Climategate’ fallout: shadow of suspicion falls across East Anglia, Times Higher Education, No. 1,935, 11.
Cowan, R. (1996) Performativity, Post-modernity and the University, Comparative Education, Vol. 32, No. 2, 245-258.
Curtis, N. (2010) ‘Customer’ isn’t always right: market model could lead to disaster, Times Higher Education, No. 1,937, p. 25.
Deco, W. and Colpaert, J. (2002) Crisis on campus: confronting academic misconduct, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
DfEE (2000) A special issue of the Higher Education digest presenting DfEE higher education projects. London: Department for Education and Employment.
Editorial (2010) Climate of fear, Nature 464, 141
Fearn, H. (2010a) One extreme to the other and everything in-between, Times Higher Education, No. 1,938.
Fearn, H. (2010b) ‘Me’ focus skews journal ratings, Times Higher Education, No. 1,937, p. 13.
Gambetta, D. (2009) Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate, Princeton & Oxford, Princeton University Press.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge. London: Sage Publications.
Grenfell, M. (2008) (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, England: Acumen.
Grosvenor, B and Hicks, G. (2009) Crap MPs, London, Harper Collins.
Harker, B. (1995) Postmodernism and Quality, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 1, No.1, 31-39.
Hefce (2009) The Research Excellence Framework: A brief guide to the proposals, www.hefc.ac.uk.
HM Treasury (2003) The Lambert review of business-university collaboration, London: The Stationary Office.
Lebrecht, N. (2010) Notes on a scandal: Does arts criticism have a future?, New Statesman, 1/3/10, p. 50.
Lewis, D.J. and Weigert, A.J. (1985) Social Atomism, Holism and Trust, The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 26, No.4, 455-471.
Lipsett, A. (2008) Cheating rife among university students, research shows, Guardian.co.uk. 2/6/10
McCabe, D.L. Trevina, L. K. Butterfield, K. D. (2001) Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research, Ethics and Behaviour, 11 (3), 219-232.
McDonald, A. (2010) Shopping for a degree, New Statesman, 22/2/10, p. 40.
Miller, David (2009) 'Corporate lobbying’s new frontier: from influencing policy-making to shaping public debate', in Dieter Zinnbauer (Ed.) Global Corruption Report, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press in association with Transparency International.
Misztal, B.A. (1996) Trust in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mollering, G. (2001) The Nature of Trust: From George Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Supervision, Sociology, Vol. 35, No.2, 403-420.
Morgan, J. (2010) Audit overload, Times Higher Education, No. 1,937, p. 33.
NCIHE (2007) The Dearing Report. Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education: Higher Education in the Learning Society. London: HMSO.
Nelson, C. (2010) No University Is an Island: Saving Academic Freedom, New York, New York University Press.
Newman, M. (2010) ‘Academic individualism’ to be reined in at the IoE, Times Higher Education, No. 1,936, 17.
Nye, R.S. (2004) Soft Power. New York: Public Affairs.
O’Neill, O. (2002) A Question of Trust, BBC Radio 4 Reith Lectures, http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/lectures.shtml, accessed, 2.2.10.
OECD (2000) Knowledge management in the learning society, Paris, OECD.
Olssen, M. and Peters. M. A. (2005) Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism, Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 20, No.3, 313-345.
Ozga, J and Jones, R. (2006) Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer, Journal of Education Policy, Vo. 21, No. 1, 1-17.
Ozga, J. (2008) Governing Knowledge: research steering and research quality, European Educational Research Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 261-272.
Peckham, D. (2010) Researchers, not their funders, must have the last word on their work, Times Higher Education, No. 1,935, 25.
Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone. The collapse and revival of American com-munity, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R.D. (1995) Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 6, 65-78.
Quine, W.V., and Ullian, J.S. (1978), The Web of Belief, Random House, New York.
Ritzer, G. (2000) The McDonaldisation of society, Thousand Island, CA, Pine Forge Press.
Roberts, D. and Thompson, L. (2007) Reputation Management for Universities, Working Paper Series No. 2, The Knowledge Partnership.
Scottish Funding Council (2004) Learning to Work: Enhancing employability and enterprise in Scottish further and higher education. Scottish Funding Council.
Sennett, R. (2002)The corrosion of character: the personal consequence of work in the new capitalism, New York and London, W.W. Norton.
Sennett, R. (2003) Mistaken on Trust: Instead of trying to justify itself, New Labor should learn to listen, The Guardian, 12/7/2003 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/jul/12/labour.uk, accessed 4.3.10)
SHEFC (2000) Report on the knowledge economy cross-cutting initiative. Available online at: www.scotland.gov.uk/government/kerf-ccr.pdf (accessed 3.1. 2010).
Simmel, G. (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Trans., ed and Introduction by K.A. Wolff, New York: Free Press (German Original 1908).
Simmel, G. (1990) 2nd edition. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge (German original, 1900).
Stewart, P. (2007) Re-envisioning the Academic Profession in the Shadow of Corporate Managerialism, JHEA/RESA, Vol. 5, No. 1, 131-147.
Tennant, P and Duggan, F. (2008) Amber Project, The Higher Education Academy, England.
The Scottish Government (2007) Skills for Scotland: a Lifelong learning skills strategy. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
Thomas, Howard (2007) “Business school strategy and the metrics for success”, Journal of Management Development, 26(1): 33-42.
Thomson (2008) “Finding Meaningful Performance Measures for Higher Educa-tion”, Thomson Reuters, available online: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/exec_report_provosts.pdf [Accessed 10 Feb. 2011].
Thrift, N. (2010) It’s now or never, Times Higher Education, No. 1,937, p. 38-41.
Williams, G. and Filippakou, O. (2010) Higher education and UK elite formation in the twentieth century. Higher Education, 59, 1-20.
Wilmott, H. (2003) Commercializing higher education in the UK: the state, industry and peer review. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2): 129-141.
Terms and conditions associated with Transnational Press London Journals Transfer of Copyright Agreement
Copyright to the unpublished and original article submitted by the author(s), the abstract forming part thereof, and any subsequent errata (collectively, the “Article”) is hereby transferred to the Transnational Press London (TPL) for the full term thereof throughout the world, subject to the Author Rights (as hereinafter defined) and to acceptance of the Article for publication in a journal of TPL. This transfer of copyright includes all material to be published as part of the Article (in any medium), including but not limited to tables, figures, graphs, movies, other multimedia files, and all supplemental materials. TPL shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
The author(s) shall have the following rights (the “Author Rights”):
- All proprietary rights other than copyright, such as patent rights.
- The nonexclusive right, after publication by TPL, to give permission to third parties to republish print versions of the Article or a translation thereof, or excerpts therefrom, without obtaining permission from TPL, provided the TPL-prepared version is not used for this purpose, the Article is not republished in another journal, and the third party does not charge a fee. If the TPL version is used, or the third party republishes in a publication or product charging a fee for use, permission from TPL must be obtained.
- The right to use all or part of the Article, including the TPL-prepared version without revision or modification, on the author(s)’ web home page or employer’s website and to make copies of all or part of the Article, including the TPL-prepared version without revision or modification, for the author(s)’ and/or the employer’s use for educational or research purposes.
- The right to post and update the Article on free-access e-print servers as long as files prepared and/or formatted by TPL or its vendors are not used for that purpose. Any such posting made or updated after acceptance of the Article for publication shall include a link to the online abstract in the TPL journal or to the entry page of the journal. If the author wishes the TPL-prepared version to be used for an online posting other than on the author(s)’ or employer’s website, TPL permission is required; if permission is granted, TPL will provide the Article as it was published in the journal, and use will be subject to TPL terms and conditions.
- The right to make, and hold copyright in, works derived from the Article, as long as all of the following conditions are met: (a) at least one author of the derived work is an author of the Article; (b) the derived work includes at least ten (10) percent of new material not covered by TPL’s copyright in the Article; and (c) the derived work includes no more than fifty (50) percent of the text (including equations) of the Article. If these conditions are met, copyright in the derived work rests with the authors of that work, and TPL (and its successors and assigns) will make no claim on that copyright. If these conditions are not met, explicit TPL permission must be obtained. Nothing in this Section shall prevent TPL (and its successors and assigns) from exercising its rights in the Article.
All copies of part or all of the Article made under any of the Author Rights shall include the appropriate bibliographic citation and notice of the TPL copyright.
By submitting a paper to the TPL journal, authors agree to this Agreement, and represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. The submitting author(s) also represent and warrant that they have the full power to enter into this Agreement and to make the grants contained herein.