Poverty measurement for a binational population

Anita Alves Pena

Abstract


Traditional poverty measures are inappropriate for migrant populations. Frequently cited poverty thresholds are calculated under assumptions that individuals and their families face only one set of prices annually. This study formulates (and contrasts to current thresholds) alternative measures for a population that spends substantial time in two (or more) countries. Specifically, weights are developed based on annual week allocations, income, family characteristics, and comparative price levels. As illustration, an example demonstrating how alternative thresholds can be generated for those whose annual work spans international boundaries is drawn from the Mexico-US migration context using survey data, official thresholds, and these weights. Despite caveats due to data limitations for the case study, illustrations should be of interest academically and to those involved in ground-level statistical calculations pertaining to demographic trends and the welfare state. 


Keywords


poverty measurement; immigration; transnational population; cost-of-living

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addison, T., Hulme, D. and Kanbur, R. (2009). “Poverty Dynamics: Measurement and Understanding from an Interdisciplinary Perspective,” in Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carvalho, S. and White, H. (1997). “Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis: The Practice and the Potential,” World Bank Technical Paper No. 366.

Dávila, A. (1982). “Sources of Depressed Earnings along the Texas-Mexico Border,” Fed¬eral Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, (November), 13–19.

Dávila, A. and Mattila, J. P. (1985). “Do Workers Earn Less along the US-Mexico Border?,” Social Science Quarterly, 66: 310–318.

Dávila, A. and Mora M. T. (2008). “Changes in the Relative Earnings Gap between Natives and Immigrants along the US-Mexico Border,” Journal of Regional Sci-ence, 48(3): 525–545.

Deaton, A. (2010). “Price Indexes, Inequality, and the Measurement of World Pov-erty,” American Economic Review, 100(1): 5–34.

Kandel, W. (2008). Profile of Hired Farmworkers, A 2008 Update. Washington D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Kakwani, N. and J. Silber (eds.) (2008). Many Dimensions of Poverty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Maskovsky, J. and Kingfisher C. (2001). “Introduction,” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 30(2/3): 105–121.

Pena, A. A. (2010). “Poverty, Legal Status, and Pay Basis: The Case of US Agricul-ture,” Industrial Relations, 49(3): 429–456.

Sen, A. K. (1997). “From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality,” Southern Eco-nomic Journal, 64(2): 383–401.

Smith, B. and Newman R. (1977). “Depressed Wages along the US-Mexico Border,” Economic Inquiry, 15, 51–66.

Short, K. S. (2011). “The Research Supplemental Poverty Measure: 2010,” US Census Bureau.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.