Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Discerning adaptation and disruption in the childbearing behaviour of immigrants in Greece: an analysis using micro-census data

Georgia Verropoulou


This paper uses micro-data from the 2001 census of Greece to detect changes in the reproductive behaviour of recent immigrants. The analysis is based on descriptive methods and ordinal logistic regression models. Possible disruption and adaptation effects are investigated for different citizenships. The findings indicate that Albanians, who represent over half of the immigrants and originate from a high fertility country, show signs of reducing levels with increasing duration of residence consistent with the adaptation hypothesis. By contrast, for migrants from other Balkan and Eastern European countries there is some indication of a disruption in childbearing among recent arrivals.


immigrant fertility; migrant fertility hypotheses; adaptation; disruption; Greece

Full Text:



Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J., and McDonald, P., 2002. ‘A Comparison of Fertility Patterns of European Immigrants in Australia with those in the Countries of Origin’, Genus LVIII(1):53-76.

Alders, M., 2000. ‘Cohort fertility of migrant women in the Netherlands, Developments in fertility of women born in Turkey, Morocco, Suriname and the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba’, Working paper presented at the BSPS-NVD-URU Conference, 31 August-1 September 2000, Division Socioeconomic Statistics, Department of Population, Hague: Statistics Netherlands.

Andersson, G., 2004. ‘Childbearing after Migration: Fertility Patterns of Foreign Born Women in Sweden’, International Migration Review, 38(2): 747-775.

Andersson, G., and Scott, K., 2005. ‘Labour-market status and first-time parenthood: the experience of immigrant women in Sweden, 1981-97’, Population Studies, 59(1): 21-38.

Bagavos, C., Tsimbos, C., and Verropoulou, G., 2008. ‘Native and Migrant Fertility Patterns in Greece, A Cohort Approach’, European Journal of Population, 24: 245-263.

Billari, F.C., 2005. ‘Europe and its fertility: From low to lowest low’. National Institute Economic Review, 194: 56-73.

Coleman, D.A., 1994. ‘Trends in fertility and intermarriage among immigrant population in western Europe and measures of integration’, Journal of Biosocial Science, 26(1): 107-136.

Dinkel, R.H., and Lebok, U.H., 1997. ‘The Fertility of Migrants Before and After Crossing the Border: The Ethnic German Population from the Former Soviet Union as a Case Study’, International Migration 35(2): 253-270.

Emke-Poulopoulou, H., 2007. Migration Challenge, in Greek, Greek Demographic Society, Athens: Papazisis.

Fokkema, T., de Valk, H., de Beer, J., and van Duin, C., 2008. ‘The Netherlands, Childbearing within the context of a “Poldermodel” society’, Demographic Re-search, 19: 743-794.

Ford, K., 1990. ‘Duration of Residence in the United States and the Fertility of U.S. Immigrants’, International Migration Review, 24(1):34-68.

Gjonca, A., Aassve, A., and Mencarini, L., 2008. ‘Albania, trends and patterns, prox-imate determinants and policies of fertility change’, Demographic Research, 19: 261-292.

Hoem, J.M., 2008. ‘The impact of public policies on European fertility’. Demographic Research, 19: 249-260.

IOM, 2003. World Migration 2003. Managing migration, challenges and responses for people on the move. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

Kahn, J.R., 1994. ‘Immigrant and Native Fertility during the 1980s: Adaptation and Expectations for the Future’, International Migration Review, 28(3):501-519.

Kulu, H., 2005. ‘Migration and Fertility: Competing Hypotheses Re-examined’, Euro-pean Journal of Population, 21:51-87.

Milewski, N., 2007. ‘First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation?’ Demographic Research, 17(29): 859-896.

Minnesota Population Center, 2008. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) — International: Version 4.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Morgan, S.P, Botev, N., Chen, R., and Huang, J., 1999. ‘White and nonwhite trends in first birth timing, Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys’, Population Research and Policy Review, 18: 339-356.

Ng, E., and Nault, F., 1997. ‘Fertility among Recent Immigrant Women to Canada, 1991: An Examination of the Disruption Hypothesis’, International Migration, 35(4): 559-580.

OECD, 2003. Trends in International Migration, SOPEMI 2002, Paris: OECD.

Psimmenos, I., and Georgoulas, S., 2001. ‘Migration Pathways: A Historic Demo-graphic and Policy Review of the Greek Case’, IAPASIS, Brussels, EUI/European Commission Community Research.

Ram, B., and George, M.V., 1990. ‘Immigrant Fertility Patterns in Canada, 1961-1980’, International Migration, 28(4): 413-426.

Sobotka, T., 2008. ‘The rising importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe’, Demographic Resarch, 19: 225-248.

Stephen, E.H., and Bean, F.D., 1992. ‘Assimilation, Disruption and the Fertility of Mexican-Origin Women in the United States’, International Migration Review 26(1):67- 88.

Toulemon, L., 2004. ‘Fertility among immigrant women, new data, a new approach’. Population & Societies, 400 (April 2004), 1-4.

Tsimbos, C., 2006. ‘The Impact of Migration on Growth and Ageing of the Population in a New Receiving Country: the Case of Greece’, International Migration, 44(4): 231-254

Tsimbos, C., 2008a. ‘Net migration estimates for Greece by age, sex and citizenship, 1991-2001’. Migration Letters, 5(2), 189-202.

Tsimbos, C., 2008b. ‘Immigrant and Native Fertility in Greece: New Estimates and Population Prospects (2005-2025)’, Population Review, 47(2): 67-84.

Verropoulou, G., Bagavos C., and Tsimbos, C., 2007. ‘Migrant and non-migrant fertility in Greece: Results based on the 2001 population census’, Migration Letters, 4(2): 147-158.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us