Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Circulation of immigrants to Hungary

Sándor Illés




We measure the demographic patterns associated with international circular migration. Firstly, we define the circulation within the conceptual framework of transnationalism. Secondly, we create macro-scale data bank on long-term international circular migrants based on an original statistical method. Thirdly, we seek to gain further insight into the composition of international circular immigrants by gender, age, and family status. Conclusions indicate the need for future research.


circulation, international migration, demographic distribution, Hungary, parity analysis

Full Text:



Bailey, A.J. (2010). “Population geographies, gender, and the migration-development nexus”, Progress in Human Geography, 34(3): 375-386.

Beguy, D. et al., (2010). “Circular migration patterns and determinants in Nairobi slum settlements”, Demographic Research, 20(23): 549-586. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.20.

Bloemraad, I. (2004). “Who claims dual citizenship? The limits of postnationalism, the possibility of transnationalism, and the persistence of traditional citizenship”, In-ternational Migration Review, 38(2): 389-426.

Cohen, J. H., & Sirkeci, I. (2011). Cultures of migration: The global nature of contemporary mobil-ity. University of Texas Press.

Constant, A. and Zimmermann, K. (2011). “Circular and repeat migration: count of exits and years away from the host country”, Population Research and Policy Review, 30(4): 495-515.

European Commission, (2011). Temporary and Circular Migration: Empirical Evidence, Cur-rent Policy Practice and Future Options in EU Member States. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

Fassmann, H., et al. (2009). Statistics and Reality: Concepts and Measurement of Migration in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Hall, CM. and Müller, DK. (2004). “Introduction: Second homes, curse or blessing? Revisted”. In: Hall, CM. and Müller, DK. (eds.): Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes. Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, Clevendon: Clevendon: Cleven-don: Channel View Publications, 3-14.

Haug, W. et al. (eds.) (2002). The Demographic Characteristics of Immigrant Population. Stras-bourg: Council of Europe.

Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. and Avila, E. (1997). “I’ m here but I’ m there: the meanings of transnational motherhood”, Gender and Society, 11(5): 548-571.

Hugo, G. (2013). What We Know About Circular Migration and Enhanced Mobility. Washing-ton DC: Migration Policy Institute.

Illés, S. and Kincses, Á. (2012). “Hungary as a receiving country for circulars”, Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 61(2): 197-218.

Jeffery, L. and Murison, J. (2011). “Guest editorial, the temporal, social, spatial, and legal dimensions of return and onward migration”, Population, Space and Place 17(2): 131-139.

Kovács, É. and Melegh, A. (2007). “In a gendered space: forms and reasons of migra-tion and the integration of female migrants”, Demográfia, 50(5): 26-59.

Kovács, Z., Boros, L., Hegedűs, G. and Lados, G. (2013). “Returning People to the Homeland: Tools and Methods Supporting Remigrants in a European Context”. In: Lang, T. (ed.): Return Migration in Central Europe: Current Trends and an Analysis of Policies Supporting Returning Migrants, Leipzig: Leibnitz-Institute für Länderkunde, 58-94.

Lang, T. and Nadler, R. (eds.) (2014). Return migration to Central and Eastern Europe: trans-national migrants' perspectives and local businesses' needs. Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde.

McHugh, K.E., et al. (1995). “Multiple residence and cyclical migration: a life course per-spective”, Professional Geographer, 47(3): 251-267.

McLoughlin, S. et al. (2011). Temporary and Circular Migration. Opportunities and Challenges. Brussels: European Policy Centre.

Montanari, A. (2012). “Cross-national cooperation and human mobility: an introduc-tion”, International Review of Sociology, 22(2): 175-190.

Newland, K. et al. (2008). Learning by Doing: Experiences of Circular Migration. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

Portes, A. and DeWind, J. (2004). “A Cross-Atlantic dialogue: the progress of research and theory in the study of international migration”, International Migration Review, 38(4): 828-851.

Sanderson, MR. (2010). “Reconsidering of the study of international migration: A way forward for macro structural migration research”, International Migration, 48(1): 179-193.

Sirkeci, I. (2009). “Transnational mobility and conflict”, Migration Letters, 6(1): 3-14.

Sirkeci, I. and Cohen, J. H. (2015). Cultures of migration and conflict in contemporary human mobility in Turkey. European Review, Vol. 22, No.2 (forthcoming).

Skeldon, R. (2012). “Going Round in Circles: Circular Migration, Poverty Alleviation and Marginality”, International Migration, 50(3): 43-60.

Tannenbaum, M. (2007). “Back and forth: immigrants stories of migration and return”, International Migration, 45(5): 147-175.

Taylor, J. and Bell, M. (2012). “Towards Comparative Measures of Circulation: Insights from Indigenous Australia”, Population, Space and Place, 18(5): 567-578.

Tóth, J. (2011). “Entry and residence in Hungary”. In: Gellérné Lukács, É. (ed.) Third-country National Researchers’ Integration in Hungary, Budapest: Tullius Publisher, 38-53.

Vertovec, S. (2007). Circular Migration: The Way forward in Global Policy. Oxford: Interna-tional Migration Institute, James Martin 21st Century School, Working Papers 4, University of Oxford.

Williams, AM., et al. (2011). “The circular international migration of New Zealanders: enfolded mobilities and relational places”, Mobilities, 6(1): 125-147.

Williams, A.M. and Baláž, V. (2008). International Migration and Knowledge. London: Routledge.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us