Acculturation attitudes and urban-related identity of internal migrants in three largest cities of Turkey
This present study explored the acculturation strategies and urban related identity of Turk and Kurd internal migrants moved from different regions of Turkey to Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir. In terms of acculturation strategies, assimilation was found to be the most preferred acculturation attitude among Turks whereas separation was found to be most endorsed acculturation attitude among Kurds. Concerning urban-related identity mean scores, Turks reported higher urban-related identity scores than Kurds. Furthermore the internal migrants in Izmir reported higher urban-related identity score than the migrants living in Istanbul and Ankara. The results of the hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that gender, length of residence and migration type were the significant predictors of integration preference of Kurds.
Ambrosini, M. (2013). “Fighting discrimination and exclusion: Civil society and immigration policies in Italy”, Migration Letters, 10: 313-323.
Arends-Toth, J. and Vijver, F.J. R. van de. (2003). “Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 249-266.
Ataca, B. and Berry, J.W. (2002). “Psychological, socio-cultural, and marital adaptation of Turkish immigrant couples in Canada”, International Journal of Psychology, 37: 13-26.
Berry, J. W. (2010). “Mobility and acculturation”. In: S. Carr (ed.) The psychology of global mobility, New York: Springer, pp.193-210.
Berry, J. W. (2006). “Context of acculturation”. In: D. L. Sam and J. W. Berry, (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27-42.
Berry, J. W. (1997). “Immigration, acculturation and adaptation”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46: 4-68.
Berry, J. W. (1992). “Acculturation and adaptation in a new society”, International Migration, 30: 69-85.
Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Minde, T., and Mok, D. (1987). “Comparative studies of acculturative stress”, International Migration Review, 21: 491-511.
Berry, J. W., Kim, U., Power, S., Young, M. and Bujaki, M. (1989). “Acculturation attitudes in plural societies”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38: 185-206.
Bilali, R., Celik, A.B. and Ok, E. (2014). “Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43:253-264.
Caglayan, H., Ozar, S. and Dogan, A. T. (2011). Ne değişti? Kürt kadınların zorunlu göç deneyimleri. A. Bora (ed.). Ankara: Ayizi Publications.
Cohen, R. (2007). “Foreward to the English Edition”. In: D. Kurban, D.Yukseker, A. B. Celik, T. Unalan and A. T. Aker (eds). Coming to terms with forced migration: Post-displacement restitution of citizenship rights in Turkey, Istanbul: TESEV, pp. 1-5.
Goksen, F. and Cemalcilar, Z. (2010). “Social capital and cultural distance as predictors of early school dropout: Implications for community action for Turkish internal migrants”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34: 163-175.
Karakuş, P. and Göregenli, M. (2008). “Linking place attachment with social identity orientation: An examination of the relationship between place attachment, social identity orientation and integration to city”, International Journal of Psychology, 43.
Goregenli, M. and Karakus, P. (2014a). “The spatial dimension in migration research: Cultural and spatial integration”, Turkish Psychological Articles, 17(34): 101-115.
Goregenli, M. and Karakus, P. (2014b). “The relations between socio-spatial mobility and urban-related identity: A comparative analysis of internal migrants and host culture members in six big cities of Turkey”, 4th International Conference: Ecology of Urban Areas Proceedings, Zrenjanin, Serbia, pp.470-479.
Goregenli, M., Karakus, P., Kosten, Y.Ö. and Umuroglu, G. I. (2014). “A study on neighborhood attachment in relation with urban-related identity”, Turkish Journal of Psychology, 29: 73-85.
Goregenli, M., Umuroglu, G.I. and Karakus, P. (2015). Gender differences in spatial and cultural integration: Internal migration in Turkey, paper presented at International Conference on Gender, Culture and Migration, March 6-7, Gdansk, Poland.
Gruber, M. (2012). “Role of municipalities in fostering integration process of people with migration background in Austria”, Migration Letters, 9: 263-272.
Gui, Y., Berry, J. W. and Zheng, Y. (2012). “Migrant worker acculturation in China”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36: 598-610.
HUNEE (Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies), (2006). Research on Migration and Displaced Persons in Turkey. Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Isik, O. and Pinarcioglu, M. (2008). Nöbetleşe yoksulluk: Gecekondulaşma ve kent yoksulları: Sultanbeyli örneği. Araştrma İnceleme Dizisi 14. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
Karakus, P. (2014) Farklı kimlik gruplarında yer kimliği, yerin anlamları ve kültürlenme süreçleri - Place identity, the meanings of place and acculturation process in multiple group identities, Unpublished PhD thesis, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
Kaya, A., Isik, I. E., Sahin, B., Elmas, E., Caglayan, B., Aksoy, P. and Velioglu, S. (2009). “Giriş: Göç, kent ve kalkınma”. In: A. Kaya (ed.) Türkiye’de iç göçler bütünleşme mi geri dönüş mü?. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Publications, pp. 1-27.
Kurban, D., Yukseker, D., Celik, A.B., Unalan, T. and Aker, A.T. (2007). “Introduction to the Turkish Edition”. In: J. Lavoie (ed.) Coming to terms with forced migration: Post-displacement restitution of citizenship rights in Turkey, Istanbul: TESEV, pp. 21-27.
Lalli, M. (1992). “Urban-related identity. Theory, measurement, and empirical findings”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12: 285-303.
Lalli, M. (1988). “Urban identity”, In: D. Canter, J.C. Jesuino, L. Soczka and G.M. Stephenson (eds.) Environmental social psychology, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.303-311.
Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., and Obdrzalek, P. (2000). “Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and nondominant groups”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24: 1-26.
Seker, D. B. (2006). “Culture adaptation (acculturation) processes in a migrated urban sample”, International Journal of Human Sciences, 3: 1-31.
Seker, D. B. and Sirkeci, I. (2014). “Life satisfaction among Turkey-origin women in the United Kingdom: Identity, acculturation, and discrimination”, Turkish Psychological Articles, 17 (34): 69-81.
Sonmez, I. O. (2007). “Concentrated urban poverty: The case of Izmir Inner Area, Turkey”, European Planning Studies, 15: 319-338.
Tekeli, İ. (2001). Türkiye Modernitesi İçinde Kent Planlaması. Modernite Aşılırken Kent Planlaması. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
Turkish Statistical Institute (2013). Official website, population statistics. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr.
Umuroglu, I., Goregenli, M. and Karakus, P. (2015). “Göçmen ya da yerli olmaya ilişkin algılar: Selçuk’la çift-kültürlü özdeşim süreci”. B. D. Seker, I. Sirkeci ve M.M. Yucesahin (der.). Göç ve Uyum. Transnational Press London (TPLONDON), pp.267-292
Unalan, T., Celik, A.B. and Kurban, D. (2007). “Internal displacement in Turkey: The issue, policies and implementation”. In: J. Lavoie (ed.) Coming to terms with forced migration: Post-displacement restitution of citizenship rights in Turkey, Istanbul: TESEV, pp.77-106.
Ward, C. and Kagitcibasi, C. (2010). “Applied acculturation research: Working with, for and beyond communities”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34: 186-189.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.