“Old” Natives and “New” Immigrants: Beyond Territory and History in Kymlicka's Account of Group-Rights
According to Will Kymlicka, only historically and territorially bound “national” groups can engage in a “nation-building” process. Recently arrived immigrant groups cannot as they have neither been able nor willing to do so. The paper argues, first, that such empirical facts are insufficient for the normative conclusions Kymlicka defends; and second, that if his ultimate goal is to achieve better “terms of integration” for immigrants, he cannot deny them the right to attempt their own “nation-building”. As an illustration, the paper describes Kymlicka's own thought-experiment of Chinese immigrants in Canada pursuing a nation-building-process analogous to the Québécois. It explores how criteria for advocating group rights other than history and territory – desert, participation, or need –avoid treating old and new minorities in an arbitrarily asymmetric manner.
Adjami, M. and Harrington, J. (2008). “The Scope and Content of Article 15 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27 (3): 93-109.
Breton, R. (1964). “Institutional Completeness of Ethnic Communities and the Personal Relations of Immigrants”, The American Journal of Sociology, 70 (2): 193-205.
Carens, J. H. (1987). “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders”, Review of Politics, 49: 251–273.
Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eisenberg, A. (2005). “Identity and Liberal Politics: The Problem of Minorities Within Minorities.” In: A. Eisenberg and J. Spinner-Halev (eds.) Minorities Within Minorities. Equality, Rights, and Diversity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg, A. (2009). Reasons of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hilpinen, R. (2011): “Artifact”. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artifact/, last access: 18/02/2014.
Kukathas, C. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago. A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (1998). “Liberal Egalitarianism and Civic Republicanism: Friends or Enemies?”. In: A. L. Allen and M. C. Regan (eds.) Debating Democracy's Discontent. Essays on American Politics, Law, and Public Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural Odysseys. Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2011a). “Beyond the Indigenous/Minority Dichotomy?” In: S. Allen and A. Xanthaki (eds.) Reflections on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Kymlicka, W. (2011b): “Multicultural citizenship within multination states”, Ethnicities, 11 (3): 281-302.
Léger, R. (2014). “Non-territorial Autonomy: Reply to Chouinard”, Ethnopolitics: Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 13 (4): 418-427.
Marx, K. (1845). German Ideology. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm#a4, last access: 10/02/2014.
Rawls, J. (1971). Theory of Justice. Revised edition 1999. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1994). “The Politics of Recognition.” In: A. Gutman (ed.) Multiculturalism. Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Torbisco Casals, N. (2006). Group Rights as Human Rights: A Liberal Approach to Multiculturalism. Amsterdam: Springer.
Young, I. M. (1997). “A Multicultural Continuum: A Critique of Will Kymlicka's Ethnic-Nation Dichotomy”, Constellations, 4 (1): 48-53.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.