Germany’s Challenges: Immigration Barriers in Minds, Economic Concerns and Subjective Well Being
The analysis aims to provide the hypothesis that the emerging anti-immigration movements in Germany made use of people’s concerns on the issues of immigration, trust in the political system of Germany and economic insecurity to find support. It shows on which ground anti-immigration movements in Germany reached popularity. The democratic deficit problem is a perceived problem in Germany. The European-level problem can be seen as rooted in Germany’s role in the EU. Three channels are identified which shape the attitude on migration: Dislike of immigrants, economic concerns and trusting other people. The analysis provides empirical evidence within a theoretical framework to a current topic in economics which was mainly restricted to people’s attitudes towards migration. Furthermore, the analysis provides empirical evidence for the corporatism hypothesis and channels shaping the attitude towards migration.
Auer, B. and Rottmann, H. (2011). Statistik und Ökonometrie für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler – Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Statistics and Econometrics for Economists – An Applied Introduction]. Wiesbaden: Gabler Publications.
Card, D., Dustman, C., and Preston, I. (2005). “Understanding Attitudes to Immigration: The Migration and Minority module of the first European Social Survey”. Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration: Discussion Paper No 03/05.
Faist, T. (1994). “How to define a foreigner? The symbolic politics of immigration in German partisan discourse, 1978–1992”. West European Politics Vol. 17 Issue 2: 50-71.
Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006). “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik”. Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 44 No. 3: 533-562.
Furlong, D. (1996). “The Conceptualization of 'Trust' in Economic Thought”. IDS Working Paper 35, Brighton.
Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481-510.
Habisch, A. and Wegner, M. (2005). “Germany – Overcoming the Heritage of Corporatism”. In: A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner and R. Schmidpeter (eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe, Berlin et al.: Springer, 111-123.
Hafeneger, B. (2014). “Die Identitären. Vorübergehendes Phänomen oder neue Bewegung?” [“The Identitarian Movement. A Temporary Phenomenon or a New Movement?”]. Expertisen für Demokratie [Expertise for Democracy] 1, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Hillman, A. L. and Weiss, A. (1999). “Beyond international factor movements: cultural preferences, endogenous policies and the migration of people, an overview”. In: R. Faini, J. de Melo, K. F. Zimmermann (eds.) Migration: The Controversies and the Evidence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 76-91.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis. Berlin et al.: Springer.
Katz, E. and Stark, O. (1987). “International migration under asymmetric information”. The Economic Journal Vol. 97 No. 387: 718-726.
Kurekova, L. (2011). Theories of Migration: Conceptual review and empirical testing in the context of the EU East-West Flows. Conference Paper of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Migration, Economic Change, Social Challenge at the University College London. Online access via https://cream.conference-services.net/resources/952/2371/pdf/MECSC2011_0139_paper.pdf (last accessed on May 5, 2016).
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaci, A., Pellegrino, A., Taylor, J. E. (1993). “Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal”. Population and Development Review 19 (3): 431-466.
Norris, P. (1997). “Representation and the Democratic Deficit”. European Journal of Political Research 32: 273-282
Paas, T. and Halapuu, V. (2012). “Attitudes towards immigrants and the integration of ethnically diverse societies”. Norface Migration Discussion Paper No. 2012-23.
Paas, T. and Demidova, O. (2014). “How people perceive immigrants' role in their country's life: a comparative study of Estonia and Russia”. Eastern Journal of European Studies Vol. 5 Issue 2: 119-140.
Patzelt, W. J. (2015). “Was und wie denken PEGIDA-Demonstranten? Analyse der PEGIDA-Demonstranten am 25. Januar 2015” [“What and how do PEGIDA-Demonstrators think? Analyzing PEGIDA-Demonstrators on January 25, 2015]. Online access via https://tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/fakultaeten/philosophische_fakultaet/ifpw/polsys/for/pegida/patzelt-analyse-pegida-2015.pdf (last accessed on January 4, 2016). Dresden: Dresden University of Technology.
PEGIDA (2015). “Dresdner Thesen” [Dresden Theses]. Online access via https://pegidaoffiziell.wordpress.com/2015/02/16/zehn-thesen-in-dresden-angeschlagen-dafur-geht-pegida-auf-die-strase/ (last accessed on May 1, 2016). California, USA: US Fan Group for PEGIDA.
Rydgren, J. (2008). “Immigration sceptics, xenophobes or racists? Radical right-wing voting in six West European countries”. European Journal of Political Research 47: 737-765.
Schiff, M. (2002). “Love thy neighbor: Trade, migration and social
capital”. European Journal of Political Economy 18 (2002): 87-107.
Schlüter, E. and Wagner, U. (2008). “Regional Differences Matter - Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49 (2-3): 153-173.
Senik, C., Stichnoth, H., Van der Straeten, K. (2009). “Immigration and Natives' Attitudes towards the Welfare State: Evidence from the European Social Survey”. Social Indicators Research 91 (2009): 345-370.
Sides, J. and Citrin, J. (2007). “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information”. British Journal of Political Science Vol. 37 No. 3: 477-504.
Stark, O. (1991). The Migration of Labor. Cambridge, MA, USA: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Stark, O. (2003). “Tales of Migration without Wage Differentials: Individual, Family, and Community Contexts”. Institutions and Economic Development 1(2): 79-92.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). “Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization”. Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 36 No. 1 Part 2 (April 1993): 463-486.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.