Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Women's social remittances and their implications at household level: A case study of Romanian migration to Italy

Ionela Vlase

Abstract


Remittances have become an important topic of research in the growing literature on the nexus between gender, migration and socio-economic development. From this point of view, Romania constitutes an important case, revealing transformations wrought by social and economic remittances not only at national and regional levels, but also at the household level. This article focuses on women migrant returnees and the effect of their social remittances on family relations. Women are often categorised under the return of conservatism group because migrants who are influenced by family in their decisions to return are less likely to become returnees of innovation. Although women return as a result of their husbands’ decisions, findings suggest that these women have begun challenging the rules that govern traditional relations between family members. This paper highlights the influence of social remittances on those left behind and raises questions about the manner by which social remittances transform households

Keywords


Gender; social remittances; return; household; Romania

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, R. (2009). The determinants of international remittances in developing countries. World Development, 37(1): 93–103.

Bartram, D. (2010). The normative foundations of 'policy implications': reflections on international labour migration. Work, Employment & Society, 24(2): 355-365.

Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Girls, race and identity. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

Broughton, C. (2008). Migration as engendered practice: Mexican men, masculinity and Northward migration. Gender and Society, 22(5): 568-589.

Cerase, F.P. (1974). Expectation and reality: a case study of return migration from the United States to Southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2): 245–262.

Chytkova, Z. (2011). Consumer acculturation, gender, and food: Romanian women in Italy between tradition and modernity. Consumption Markets and Culture, 14(3): 267-291.

De Haas, H. (2009). International migration and regional development in Morocco: A review. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(10): 1571-1593.

De Sousa, J. and L. Duval (2010). Geographic distance and remittances in Romania: out sight, out of mind?. Economie Internationale, 121: 81-97.

Gal, S. and G. Kligman (2000). The politics of gender after socialism. A comparative historical essay, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gallo, E. (2006). Italy is not a good place for men: narratives of places, marriage and masculinity among Malayali migrants. Global Networks, 6(4): 357-372.

Giddens, A. (1998). The third way. The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

Goldring, L. (2004). Family and collective remittances to Mexico: A multi-dimensional typology. Development and Change, 35(4): 799-840.

Grigorian, D.A. and T.A. Melkonyan (2011). Destined to receive: The impact of remittances on household decisions in Armenia. Review of Development Economics, 15(1): 139–153.

Gerson, J. and K. Peiss (1985). Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualizing Gender Relations. Social Problems, 32(4): 317-331.

Guarnizo, E.L. (2003). The economics of transnational living. International Migration Review, 37(3): 666-699.

Haidinger, B. (2008). Contingencies among households: gendered division of labor and transnational household organization – The case of Ukrainians in Austria. In H. Lutz (Ed.) Migration and domestic work. A European perspective on a global theme, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 127-144.

ISTAT (2011). Demography in figures. Available at: http://demo.istat.it/

King, R., A. Castaldo. and J. Vullnetari (2011). Gendered relations and filial duties along the Greek-Albanian remittance corridor. Economic Geography, 87(4): 393–419.

King, R., M. Dalipaj and N. Mai (2006). Gendering migration and remittances: Evi-dence from London and Northern Albania. Population, Space and Place, 12(6): 409-434.

Kunz, R. (2008). “Remittances are beautiful? Gender implications of the new global remittances trend. Third World Quarterly, 29: 1389–409.

León-Ledesma, M. and M. Piracha (2004). International migration and the role of remittances in Eastern Europe. International Migration, 42(4): 65-83.

Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion, International Migration Review, 32(4): 926-948.

Lucas, R., and O. Stark (1985). Motivations to remit: Evidence from Botswana. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(5): 901-918.

Lutz, H. (2010). Gender in the migratory process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10):1647-1663.

Morokvasic, M. (2004). 'Settled in mobility': Engendering post-wall migration in Europe. Feminist Review, 77: 7-25.

Pantea, M.C. (2011). Young People’s Perspectives on Changing Families’ Dynamics of Power in the Context of Parental Migration. Young, 19(4): 375-395.

Piperno, F. (2011). The impact of female emigration on families and the welfare state in countries of origin: The case of Romania. International Migration, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00668.x

Portes, A. (2010). Migration and social change: Some conceptual reflections. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10): 1537-1563.

Raghuram, P. (2009). Which migration, what development? Unsettling the edifice of migration and development. Population, Space and Place, 15(2):103-117.

Rahman, M.M. (2009). Temporary migration and changing family dynamics: implications for social development. Population, space and place, 15(2): 161-174.

Sana, M. and D. Massey (2005). Household composition, family migration, and community context: Migrant remittances in four countries. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2): 509-528.

Schuerkens, U. (2005). Transnational migrations and social transformations: A theoretical perspective. Current Sociology, 53(4): 535-553.

SOPEMI (2010). International migration outlook. OECD.

Sørensen, N.N., N. Van Hear and P. Engberg (2002). The migration-development nexus. Evidence and policy options, IOM, migration research series, no 8.

Stahl, P. (1986). Household, Village, and Village Confederation in Southeastern Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.

Stănculescu, M.S. and L. Pop (2009). The Transition Process and Changes in Income, Income Inequality and Poverty: The Case of Romania. In: M.S. Stănculescu and T. Stanovnik (Eds.) Activity, Incomes and Social Welfare. A Comparison Across Four New EU Member States. Vienna: Ashgate, pp. 177-230.

Suksomboon, P. (2008). Remittances and 'social remittances': Their impact on liveli-hoods of Thai women in the Netherlands and non-migrants in Thailand. Gender, Technology and Development, 12(3):461-482.

Tiemoko, R. (2004). Migration, return and socio-economic change in West Africa: The role of family. Population, Space and Place, 10(2): 155–174.

Vlase, I. (forthcoming). 'My husband is a patriot!' Gender and the Romanian family return migration from Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.

Voicu, M. and P.A. Tufiş (2012). Trends in gender beliefs in Romania: 1993-2008. Current Sociology, 60(1): 61-80.

Wong, M. (2006). The gendered politics of remittances in Ghanaian transnational families. Economic Geography, 82(4): 355-381.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.