Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

1.5-generation immigrant adolescents’ autonomy negotiations in transnational family contexts

Elina Turjanmaa, Anne Alitolppa-Niitamo, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti


This study explored how 1.5-generation immigrant adolescents negotiate their autonomy with their parents in a new cultural context. The studied adolescents are immigrants with African, Middle Eastern, Southern Asian, and EU/FSU background in Finland. The study is built on the ecological framework, which looks at development within the context of social systems. The study combines perspectives of cross-cultural psychology, acculturation research, and developmental psychology to explore autonomy in a transnational developmental context. The data consists of 80 semi-structured interviews with immigrant adolescents aged 13 to 18. Our results suggest that adolescents’ autonomy is negotiated within local family circumstances, while the transnational context becomes particularly crucial in the negotiation categories of peer relations and cultural continuity. Cultural differences in using different negotiation categories are discussed.


immigrant adolescents; transnational adolescents; 1.5 generation; intergenerational relations; autonomy

Full Text:



Alitolppa-Niitamo, A. (2002). “The generation in-between: Somali youth and schooling in metropolitan Helsinki”. Intercultural Education, 13 (3): 275−290.

Alitolppa-Niitamo, A. (2004). The icebreakers: Somali-speaking youth in the context of formal education in metropolitan Helsinki. Helsinki: Väestöliitto, Väestöntutkimuslaitos.

Aveling, E.-L., Gillespie, A. and Cornish, F. (2015). ”A qualitative method for analyzing multivoicedness”. Qualitative Research, 15 (6): 670−687.

Bartley, A. and Spoonley, P. (2008). “Intergenerational transnationalism: 1.5 generation Asian migrants in New Zealand”. International Migration, 46 (4), 63−84.

Bengtson, V., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B., & Silverstein, M. (2002). Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 568−576.

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46 (1), 5−68.

Bhatia, S. (2002). “Acculturation, dialogical voices and the construction of the diasporic self”. Theory & Psychology, 12 (1), 55−77.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Christman, J. (2004). “Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves”. Philosophical Studies, 117: 143−164.

City of Helsinki (2016). Population with foreign language background in Helsinki 2015. Statistics 2016: 2. City of Helsinki Urban Facts. Http:// (retrieved 27 February 2016).

Dilworth-Anderson, P., Brummett, B., Goodwin, P., Williams, S., Williams, R. and Siegler, I. (2005). “Effect of race on cultural justifications for caregiving”. Journal of Gerontology, 60B (5): S257−S262.

Falicov, C. J. (2005). “Emotional transnationalism and family identities”. Family Process, 44 (4): 399−406.

Fuligni, A. J. (1998). “Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion: A study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds”. Developmental Psychology, 34 (4), 782−792.

Fuligni, A. J. and Pedersen, S. (2002). “Family obligation and the transition to young adulthood”. Developmental Psychology, 38 (5): 856−868.

Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis”. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9): 1277−1288.

Hui, C. H. and Triandis, H. C. (1986). “Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17 (2): 225−248.

Jensen, L. A. and Dost-Gözkan, A. (2015). “Adolescent-parent relations in Asian Indian and Salvadoran immigrant families: A cultural-developmental analysis of autonomy, authority, conflict, and cohesion”. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25 (2): 340−351.

Kağitçibaşi, C. (2005). “Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36 (4): 403−422.

Kağitçibaşi, C. (2007). Families, self and human development across cultures: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kağitçibaşi, C. (2013). “Adolescent autonomy-relatedness and the family in cultural context: What is optimal?”. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23 (2): 223−235.

Kwak, K. (2003). “Adolescents and their parents: A review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families”. Human Development, 46: 115−136.

Motti-Stefanidi, F., Berry, J., Chryssochoou X., Sam D. and Phinney, J. (2012). “Positive immigrant youth adaptation in context: developmental, acculturation, and socio-psychological perspectives”. In: A. Masten, K. Liebkind and D. Hernandez (eds.) Realizing the potential of immigrant youth (pp. 117−158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Noom, M., Dekovic, M. and Meeus, W. (2001). “Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30 (5): 577−595.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T. and Frels, R. K. (2013). Foreword: Using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to frame quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7 (1): 2−8.

Phinney, J. S., Kim-Jo, T., Osorio, S. and Vilhjalmdottir, P. (2005). “Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-parent disagreements: Ethnic and developmental factors”. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20 (8): 8−39.

Phinney, J. S., Berry, J. W., Sam, D. L. and Vedder, P. (2006). “Understanding immigrant youth: Conclusions and implications”. In: J. W. Berry, J. S. Phinney, D. L. Sam & P. Vedder (eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition (pp. 211−254). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Portes, A. and Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the second generation. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

Rasmi, S., Daly, T. M. and Chuang, S. S. (2014). “Intergenerational conflict management in immigrant Arab Canadian families”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (7): 1124−1144.

Redfield, R., Linton, R. and Herskovits, M. J. (1936). “Memorandum for the study of acculturation”. American Anthropologist, 38 (1): 149−152.

Sam, D. L. and Oppedal, B. (2003). Acculturation as a developmental pathway. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 8 (1). (retrieved 7 September 2016).

Smetana, J., Campione-Barr, N. and Daddis, C. (2004). “Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents”. Child Development, 75 (5): 1418−1434.

Steinberg, L. (2001). “We know these things: Parent adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect”. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11 (1): 1−19.

Suárez-Orozco, C. and Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Sugimura, K., Yamazaki, M., Phinney, J. S. and Takeo, K. (2009). “Compliance, negotiation, and self-assertion in Japanese adolescents’ disagreements with parents”. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33 (1): 77−87.

Suizzo, A.-M. (2007). “Parents’ goals and values for children: Dimensions of independence and interdependence across four U.S. ethnic groups”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (4): 506−530.

Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Way, N., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H., Kahana Kalman, R. and Niwa, E. Y. (2008). “Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals”. Social Development, 17 (1): 183−208.

Titzmann, P. and Silbereisen, R. (2012). “Acculturation or development? Autonomy expectations among ethnic German immigrant adolescents and their native German age-mates”. Child Development, 83 (5): 1640−1654.

United Nations (2015). International migration 2015. Http:// (retrieved 27 February 2016).

Verkuyten, M. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove, UK: New York: Psychology Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us