Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Ruling on belonging: transnational marriages in Nordic immigration laws

Sanna Mustasaari

Abstract


For migrants, participating in transnational networks and having ties to more than one country often results in the formation of marital unions involving transnational communities. This article examines how transnational marriage migration is regulated in Nordic immigration laws, in particular through the definition of family, income requirements, and integration requirements. Drawing on the idea that constructing and contesting the belonging of individuals to families and political communities in nation states are central struggles in these laws, the article studies the right to respect for family life and freedom from discrimination within the context of immigration as a site of resistance. By claiming rights to equal treatment and respect for family life, individuals with transnational ties can challenge policies that frame their belonging through ethnic, racial or gendered stereotypes


Keywords


transnational marriage migration; Nordic countries; immigration law; European Court of Human Rights; belonging

Full Text:

PDF

References


Borevi, K. (2015). Family Migration Policies and Politics: Understanding the Swedish Exception. Journal of Family Issues, 36 (11): 1490–1508.

Bredal, A. (2011). Border control to prevent forced marriages: Choosing between protecting women and protecting the nation. In: A. Gill and A. Sundari (eds.) Forced Marriage: Introducing the Legal Null Rights Perspective (pp. 90‒111). London and New York: Zed Books.

Campbell, S., Boulougari, A and Koo, Y. (2013). Fractured Childhoods: The separation of families by immigration detention. Executive summary of a report by the Bail for Immigration Detainees. http://www.biduk.org/sites/default/files/media/docs/EXEC %20SUMM%20FRACTURED%20CHILDHOODS%20THE%20SEPARATION%20OF%20FAMILIES%20BY%20IMMIGRATION%20DETENTION-1.pdf (retrieved 26 November 2016).

Carens, J. (2003). Who should get in? The ethics of immigration admissions. Ethics & International Affairs, 17: 95–110.

Çelikaksoy, A., Skyt Nielsen, H. and Verner, M. (2006). Marriage migration: just another case of positive assortative matching? Review of Economics of the Household, 4 (3): 253–275.

Charsley, K. (2012). Transnational Marriage. In: K. Charsley (ed.) Transnational Marriage: New Perspectives from Europe and Beyond (pp. 3−22). Abingdon: Routledge.

Costello, C. (2015). The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Douzinas, C. (2000). The end of human rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Econ Pöyry. (2010) Marriages of convenience: A comparative study. Rules and practices in Norway, Sweden, Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands. Commissioned by the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI). Https://www.udi.no/globalassets/global/ forskning-fou_i/arbeid-og-opphold/marriages-of-convenience.pdf (retrieved 26 November 2016).

ECRI (2001). European Commission against Racism and Intolerance. The second report on Denmark (CRI 2001: 4). 53. In its second report on Denmark, (CRI (2001) 4)

Eggebø, H. (2013). Real Marriage? Regulating Marriage Migration to Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39 (5): 773–789

Eggebø, H. (2012). The Regulation of Marriage Migration to Norway. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the University of Bergen. http://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/6421/Dr.thesis_Helga%20Eggebo.pdf?sequence=1 (retrieved 6 June 2016).

Fair, L. (2010). ’Why can’t I get married?’ – Denmark and the ‘Twenty-four year law’. Social & Cultural Geography, 11 (2): 139‒153.

Fernandez, N. and Jensen, T. G. (2014). Intimate Contradictions: Comparing the Impact of Danish Family Reunification Laws on Pakistani and Cuban Marriage Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40 (7): 1136–1153.

Horsti, K. and Pellander, S. (2015). Conditions of cultural citizenship: intersections of gender, race and age in public debates on family migration. Citizenship Studies, 19: 751–767.

Hurri, S. (2014). Birth of the European Individual: Law, Security, Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.

Jónsson, A. K. (2013). Statistical information on foreign nationals and immigrants in Iceland. ÍSAFJÖRÐUR, July 2013. http://www.mcc.is/media/frettir/tolfraediskyrsla-2013-english.pdf (retrieved 31 October 2016).

Kofman, E. (2004). Family-Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (2): 243–262.

Kostakopoulou, D. (2010). Matters of Control: Integration Tests, Naturalisation Reform and Probationary Citizenship in the United Kingdom. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36 (5): 829−846.

OECD (2013). Income distribution and poverty. Http://stats.oecd.org/ (retrieved 12 June 2016).

OECD (2016). International Migration Outlook 2016, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2016-en (retrieved 31 October 2016).

Pellander, S. (2016). Gatekeepers of the Family - Regulating Family Migration to Finland. Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland. Https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/162719/gatekeep.pdf?sequence=1 (retrieved 12 June 2016).

Migrationsverket (2015). Beviljade uppehållstillstånd och registrerade uppehållsrätter, första och andra instans (beslut av Migrationsverket och Migrationsdomstolarna). Förstagångstillstånd. (Granted residence permits in the first and second instances. Decisions of the Migration Directorate and Courts. First residence permits.) http://www.migrationsverket.se/download/18.7c00d8e6143101d166d1ab3/1451894591568/Beviljade+uppehållstillstånd+och+registrerade+uppehållsrätter+2015.pdf (retrieved 31 October 2016).

Maahanmuuttovirasto (2015). Myönteiset ja kielteiset ratkaisut ensimmäisiin oleskelulupiin 1.1.2015 – 31.12.2015. (Decisions to applications on first residence permits 1.1.2015 – 31.12.2015.) http://www.migri.fi/download/64978_Ratkaisut_perusteittain_ 2015. pdf?4c8e300d87dcd388 (retrieved 31 October 2016).

Mustasaari, S. (2016). Best Interests of the child in family reunification – a citizenship test disguised? In: A. Griffiths, S. Mustasaari and. A. Mäki-Petäjä-Leinonen (eds.) Subjectivity, Citizenship and Belonging: Identities and Intersections (pp. 123–145). Abingdon: Routledge.

Mustasaari, S. (2015). The ‘nuclear family paradigm’ as a marker of rights and belonging in transnational families. Social Identities, 21 (4): 359–372.

Schmidt, G. (2011). Law and Identity: Transnational Arranged Marriages and the Boundaries of Danishness. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37 (2): 257‒275.

Skyt Nielsen, H., Smith, N. and Çelikaksoy, A. (2009). The Effect of Marriage on Education of Immigrants: Evidence from a Policy Reform Restricting Marriage Migration. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111 (3): 457–486.

Statistics Denmark (2015). VAN66: Residence permits (year) by type of residence permit and citizenship. http://www.statbank.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1280 (retrieved 31 October 2016).

Staver, A. (2013). Free Movement and the Fragmentation of Family Reunification Rights. European Journal of Migration and Law, 15: 69–89.

Staver, A. (2014). From right to earned privilege? The development of stricter family immigration rules in Denmark, Norway, and the United Kingdom. Political Science, University of Toronto, Canada. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/ 68295/1/Staver_Anne_201411_PhD_thesis.pdf (retrieved 12 June 2016).

Swedish Government (4 August 2016). Försörjningskrav för anhöriginvandring. (Self-support requirement for family reunification. Press release.) http://www.regeringen.se/ pressmeddelanden/2016/08/forsorjningskrav-for-anhoriginvandring/ (retrieved 27 November 2016).

Swedish Government (2015). Regeringens proposition 2015/16:174 (Government’s proposal). http://www.regeringen.se/49927f/contentassets/075968fdd8c94788977 dba14bae16444/forslag-om-att-tillfalligt-begransa-mojligheten-att-fa-uppehallstillstand-i-sverige-prop.-201516174 (retrieved 27 November 2016).

UDI (Norwegian Directorate of Immigration) (2015). Tall og fakta 2015. (Figures and facts 2015). https://www.udi.no/globalassets/statistikk-og-analyse/tall-og-fakta-2015/tall-og-fakta-2015.html (retrieved 26 November 2016).

YLE (2016). Supreme Administrative Court torpedoes deportation appeal for Iraqi mother and child. 24 October 2016, updated 15 November 2016. http://yle.fi/uutiset/ osasto/news/supreme_administrative_court_torpedoes_deportation_appeal_for_iraqi_mother_and_child/9249586 (retrieved 15 November 2016).

“Migri filing report on Iraqi mother-child deportation case”. 6 June 2016. Http://yle.fi/uutiset/migri_filing_report_on_iraqi_mother-child_deportation_case/8935274 (retrieved 11 June 2016).

Walsum, S. van (2008). The Family and the Nation: Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms, New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Yuval-Davis, N. (2012). The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations, London: SAGE Publications.

Yuval-Davis, N., Kannabiran, K. and Vieten, U. (2006). Introduction. In: N. Yuval-Davis, K. Kannabiran and U. Vieten (eds.) The Situated Politics of Belonging (pp. 1‒14). London: SAGE Publications.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Transnational Press London

Copyright © 2003-2016 Migration Letters / Transnational Press London | All rights reserved | Contact Us
TRANSNATIONAL PRESS LONDON LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES No. 8771684.